Sealed on Base.
This receipt hash matches the stored payload and has a Base transaction attached.
StatusSealed
Stored hash0x839dff...414cbe
Recomputed hash0x839dff...414cbe
Versionfp-receipt-v1
Content hash
0x839dff594e41a9b8f9b0830681bfc5cb211ce39770265e1b5a886fa998414cbeBase transaction0xf791bfa58f438e0b4538ea1d3e3c80ae4ee3df418537bd722feea447b0104de6Sealed 6/23/2026, 5:22:44 PM
What this proves
The hash proves this receipt content matches the stored seal payload. Once a Base transaction is attached, it proves the hash existed at that onchain timestamp. It does not prove the claim is true by itself.
Canonical payload
{"canonicalPath":"/v/turnitin-s-ai-score-alone-8enoz","receipt":{"challengePrompt":"To overturn this result, bring Turnitin or school policy saying one AI score alone is enough for adverse action.","claim":"Turnitin's AI score alone proves a student used ChatGPT.","confidence":"High","createdAt":"2026-06-20T06:20:46.199Z","kicker":"Turnitin scores are review signals, not proof by themselves.","paidAt":"2026-06-20T06:20:46.222Z","reasons":[{"body":"Detector output may help decide what to inspect, but it should not replace a review of drafts, notes, and writing process.","stance":"context","title":"The score can start a review"},{"body":"University guidance has warned that AI detector results are not reliable enough to stand alone in high-stakes discipline.","stance":"weakens","title":"Sole-basis punishment is weak"},{"body":"Version history, drafts, notes, citations, and an explanation of the work answer the accusation better than arguing over one percentage.","stance":"context","title":"Process evidence is stronger"}],"score":24,"shareLine":"FactPage check: TWISTED. A Turnitin AI score can be a signal, but it is not proof of ChatGPT use by itself.","slug":"turnitin-s-ai-score-alone-8enoz","sources":[{"imageUrl":null,"publisher":"Purdue University","title":"Turnitin adding AI writing detection, but instructors should use it with caution","url":"https://www.purdue.edu/online/turnitin-adding-ai-writing-detection-but-instructors-should-use-it-with-caution/","usedFor":"University guidance on treating Turnitin AI detection as a cautious review aid, not standalone proof."},{"imageUrl":"https://cdn.vanderbilt.edu/vu-wpfsx/wp-content/uploads/sites/133/2023/08/turnitin-AI-placeholder.jpeg","publisher":"Vanderbilt University","title":"Guidance on AI Detection","url":"https://www.vanderbilt.edu/brightspace/2023/08/16/guidance-on-ai-detection-and-why-were-disabling-turnitins-ai-detector/","usedFor":"Institutional guidance on high-stakes detector use."},{"imageUrl":null,"publisher":"MIT Sloan Teaching & Learning Technologies","title":"AI Detectors Don't Work","url":"https://mitsloanedtech.mit.edu/ai/teach/ai-detectors-dont-work/","usedFor":"Teaching guidance on false accusation risk."}],"summary":"Turnitin AI scores can flag text for review, but public education guidance warns against treating detector output as the sole basis for punishment or misconduct findings.","vaultCategory":"AI detector","verdict":"MISLEADING"},"type":"factpage.receipt","version":"fp-receipt-v1"}