Sealed on Base.
This receipt hash matches the stored payload and has a Base transaction attached.
StatusSealed
Stored hash0xf2839b...df1761
Recomputed hash0xf2839b...df1761
Versionfp-receipt-v1
Content hash
0xf2839b036f59df4ee24600441b42253d98d14a645b7623d9b3686941d1df1761Base transaction0x05eeb45304e5611692ef71b269834cc8ba2cd8cd2338454e8b3d6e4248300e78Sealed 6/22/2026, 6:53:54 PM
What this proves
The hash proves this receipt content matches the stored seal payload. Once a Base transaction is attached, it proves the hash existed at that onchain timestamp. It does not prove the claim is true by itself.
Canonical payload
{"canonicalPath":"/v/non-native-speakers-flagged-by-ai-cft0o","receipt":{"challengePrompt":"Do you have evidence showing current AI detectors are unbiased against non-native English writers? Submit your proof.","claim":"Non-native speakers flagged by AI detectors probably used ChatGPT or a translator.","confidence":"High","createdAt":"2026-06-21T05:27:29.314Z","kicker":"A flag against a non-native writer is a bias warning, not a confession.","paidAt":"2026-06-21T05:27:29.309Z","reasons":[{"body":"Stanford HAI summarized research showing popular detectors can misclassify non-native English essays as AI-generated.","stance":"weakens","title":"Research found over-flagging of non-native writing"},{"body":"The study links the bias to constrained linguistic patterns, which can be normal for non-native academic writing.","stance":"context","title":"The mechanism is predictable prose"},{"body":"Drafts, notes, prior writing, and a conversation about choices are stronger than treating a detector score as identity proof.","stance":"supports","title":"A fair review needs process evidence"}],"score":10,"shareLine":"FactPage check: FALSE. A non-native speaker flagged by an AI detector did not automatically use ChatGPT. Detector bias is a documented risk.","slug":"non-native-speakers-flagged-by-ai-cft0o","sources":[{"imageUrl":null,"publisher":"Stanford HAI","title":"AI Detectors Biased Against Non-Native English Writers","url":"https://hai.stanford.edu/news/ai-detectors-biased-against-non-native-english-writers","usedFor":"Research summary on detector bias against non-native English writing."},{"imageUrl":null,"publisher":"Patterns / PMC","title":"GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writers","url":"https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10382961/","usedFor":"Peer-reviewed article documenting bias and robustness issues in GPT detectors."},{"imageUrl":null,"publisher":"MIT Sloan Teaching & Learning Technologies","title":"AI Detectors Don't Work","url":"https://mitsloanedtech.mit.edu/ai/teach/ai-detectors-dont-work/","usedFor":"Teaching guidance on false positives and safer review practices."}],"summary":"No. Non-native English writers can be falsely flagged because some detectors treat predictable wording and simpler syntax as machine-like. A detector flag is not proof that the writer used ChatGPT or a translator; it is a reason to inspect drafts, process, and assignment context carefully.","vaultCategory":"AI detector","verdict":"FALSE"},"type":"factpage.receipt","version":"fp-receipt-v1"}